An identifier for this person. Should be at Fødselsnummer or D-nummer

Identifier for a person within a particular scope.

• value @ system

Fødselsnummer for the patient. Fødselsnummer as one of the possible patient identifier, should at least be sent unless there is a reason not to. Reasons for not sending the Fødselsnummer include but are not limited to, research and apps without a contract for processing data.

Multiple FNR can exist for a person. If several FNR is provided the time period that each identifier is valid should be provided. No information about period is required when only one FNR is provided.

Identifies that this is a Norwegian Fødselsnummer

The Norwegian Fødselsnummer

The D-nummer of the patient. (assigned by the norwegian Skatteetaten)

The identification of the Norwegian D-nummer

The actual Norwegian D-nummer

no-basis: Can reference no-basis-Patient in addition to Patient resources. If a person reference is needed the optional extension should be used.

The patient this person is related to.

no-basis: adds slice definitions for three relationship codings from the Norwegian Folkeregisteret. Some relationships are ordered (a person is a parent of a child but the child on the other hand is the child of a parent). Ordered relationships are always expressed from the RelatedPerson instance to the Patient/Person instance referenced in the RelatedPerson.patient element. This will usually be the EXACT OPPOSITE of the actual data recorded in FREG, as relationships in FREG is recorded with the view from the Person to the RelatedPersons.

The nature of the relationship between a patient and the related person.

• value @ coding.system

Sivilstand as registered in the norwegian Person Index (folkeregisteret).

• uoppgitt (kode i DSF: 0) • ugift (kode i DSF: 1) • gift (kode i DSF: 2) • enkeEllerEnkemann (enke eller enkemann) (kode i DSF: 3) • skilt (kode i DSF: 4) • separert (kode i DSF: 5) • registrertPartner(registrert partner) (kode i DSF: 6) • separertPartner (separert partner) (kode i DSF: 7) • skiltPartner (skilt partner) (kode i DSF: 8) • gjenlevendePartner (gjenlevende partner) (kode i DSF: 9)

Family relationship from Norwegian Person Index. This is the role of the RelatedPerson instance in a familyrelation to the Person/Patient instance(relatertPersonsRolle).

mor far medmor barn søsken ektefelleEllerPartner dødfødtBarn

Parental responsibility registered in Norwegian person index.

barnet har krav på omsut og omtanke frå dei som har foreldreansvaret. Dei har rett og plikt til å ta avgjerder for barnet i personlege tilhøve innanfor dei grensene som §§ 31 til 33 set. Foreldreansvaret skal utøvast ut frå barnet sine interesser og behov. Dei som har foreldreansvaret, er skyldige til å gje barnet forsvarleg oppseding og forsyting. Dei skal syte for at barnet får utdanning etter evne og givnad Inneholder hvem som evt. har foreldremyndighet for en umyndig person. foreldremyndighet = myndighet til å inneha og utøve et foreldreansvar

Kodeverdier i Registeret i Freg:

• felles
• mor
• far
• medmor
• andre
• ukjent I Registeret vil ansvaret bli vist som en to-veis relasjon vha. identifikatorer eller identifiserende informasjon. De gjeldende relasjonene til personer/barnevernsnemnd o.l. vil i praksis opphøre når personen ikke lenger er underlagt foreldreansvar, men de vil ikke opphøre i Registeret. Når informasjonen er migrert fra DSF vil Registeret være oppdatert i takt med DSF.

http://hl7.no/fhir/StructureDefinition/no-basis-Address

An identifier for this person. Should be at Fødselsnummer or D-nummer

Identifier for a person within a particular scope.

• value @ system

Fødselsnummer for the patient. Fødselsnummer as one of the possible patient identifier, should at least be sent unless there is a reason not to. Reasons for not sending the Fødselsnummer include but are not limited to, research and apps without a contract for processing data.

Multiple FNR can exist for a person. If several FNR is provided the time period that each identifier is valid should be provided. No information about period is required when only one FNR is provided.

Identifies that this is a Norwegian Fødselsnummer

The Norwegian Fødselsnummer

The D-nummer of the patient. (assigned by the norwegian Skatteetaten)

The identification of the Norwegian D-nummer

The actual Norwegian D-nummer

no-basis: Can reference no-basis-Patient in addition to Patient resources. If a person reference is needed the optional extension should be used.

The patient this person is related to.

no-basis: adds slice definitions for three relationship codings from the Norwegian Folkeregisteret. Some relationships are ordered (a person is a parent of a child but the child on the other hand is the child of a parent). Ordered relationships are always expressed from the RelatedPerson instance to the Patient/Person instance referenced in the RelatedPerson.patient element. This will usually be the EXACT OPPOSITE of the actual data recorded in FREG, as relationships in FREG is recorded with the view from the Person to the RelatedPersons.

The nature of the relationship between a patient and the related person.

• value @ coding.system

Sivilstand as registered in the norwegian Person Index (folkeregisteret).

• uoppgitt (kode i DSF: 0) • ugift (kode i DSF: 1) • gift (kode i DSF: 2) • enkeEllerEnkemann (enke eller enkemann) (kode i DSF: 3) • skilt (kode i DSF: 4) • separert (kode i DSF: 5) • registrertPartner(registrert partner) (kode i DSF: 6) • separertPartner (separert partner) (kode i DSF: 7) • skiltPartner (skilt partner) (kode i DSF: 8) • gjenlevendePartner (gjenlevende partner) (kode i DSF: 9)

Family relationship from Norwegian Person Index. This is the role of the RelatedPerson instance in a familyrelation to the Person/Patient instance(relatertPersonsRolle).

mor far medmor barn søsken ektefelleEllerPartner dødfødtBarn

Parental responsibility registered in Norwegian person index.

barnet har krav på omsut og omtanke frå dei som har foreldreansvaret. Dei har rett og plikt til å ta avgjerder for barnet i personlege tilhøve innanfor dei grensene som §§ 31 til 33 set. Foreldreansvaret skal utøvast ut frå barnet sine interesser og behov. Dei som har foreldreansvaret, er skyldige til å gje barnet forsvarleg oppseding og forsyting. Dei skal syte for at barnet får utdanning etter evne og givnad Inneholder hvem som evt. har foreldremyndighet for en umyndig person. foreldremyndighet = myndighet til å inneha og utøve et foreldreansvar

Kodeverdier i Registeret i Freg:

• felles
• mor
• far
• medmor
• andre
• ukjent I Registeret vil ansvaret bli vist som en to-veis relasjon vha. identifikatorer eller identifiserende informasjon. De gjeldende relasjonene til personer/barnevernsnemnd o.l. vil i praksis opphøre når personen ikke lenger er underlagt foreldreansvar, men de vil ikke opphøre i Registeret. Når informasjonen er migrert fra DSF vil Registeret være oppdatert i takt med DSF.

Defines the format of norwegian human name according to norwegian legislation (lov om personnavn).

Names may be changed, or repudiated, or people may have different names in different contexts. Names may be divided into parts of different type that have variable significance depending on context, though the division into parts does not always matter. With personal names, the different parts might or might not be imbued with some implicit meaning; various cultures associate different importance with the name parts and the degree to which systems must care about name parts around the world varies widely.

http://hl7.no/fhir/StructureDefinition/no-basis-Address

Note: address is intended to describe postal addresses for administrative purposes, not to describe absolute geographical coordinates. Postal addresses are often used as proxies for physical locations (also see the Location resource).

Information about a person that is involved in a patient's health or the care for a patient, but who is not the target of healthcare, nor has a formal responsibility in the care process.

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

Within the context of the FHIR RESTful interactions, the resource has an id except for cases like the create and conditional update. Otherwise, the use of the resouce id depends on the given use case.

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of its narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

The base language in which the resource is written.

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

Contained resources do not have a narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.

These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, nor can they have their own independent transaction scope. This is allowed to be a Parameters resource if and only if it is referenced by a resource that provides context/meaning.

This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags in their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

An identifier for this person. Should be at Fødselsnummer or D-nummer

Identifier for a person within a particular scope.

People are known by a variety of ids. Some institutions maintain several, and most collect identifiers for exchange with other organizations concerning the patient. Examples are national person identifier and local identifier.

RelatedPerson identifiers might not be unique across instances within a system, as a single human individual may be represented as many different RelatedPerson resources with different roles, periods, or relationships.

• value @ system

Fødselsnummer for the patient. Fødselsnummer as one of the possible patient identifier, should at least be sent unless there is a reason not to. Reasons for not sending the Fødselsnummer include but are not limited to, research and apps without a contract for processing data.

Multiple FNR can exist for a person. If several FNR is provided the time period that each identifier is valid should be provided. No information about period is required when only one FNR is provided.

People are known by a variety of ids. Some institutions maintain several, and most collect identifiers for exchange with other organizations concerning the patient. Examples are national person identifier and local identifier.

RelatedPerson identifiers might not be unique across instances within a system, as a single human individual may be represented as many different RelatedPerson resources with different roles, periods, or relationships.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

The purpose of this identifier.

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.

This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.

Identifies that this is a Norwegian Fødselsnummer

There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.

Identifier.system is always case sensitive.

The Norwegian Fødselsnummer

If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/rendered-value). Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.

Time period during which identifier is/was valid for use.

Organization that issued/manages the identifier.

The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.

The D-nummer of the patient. (assigned by the norwegian Skatteetaten)

People are known by a variety of ids. Some institutions maintain several, and most collect identifiers for exchange with other organizations concerning the patient. Examples are national person identifier and local identifier.

RelatedPerson identifiers might not be unique across instances within a system, as a single human individual may be represented as many different RelatedPerson resources with different roles, periods, or relationships.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

The purpose of this identifier.

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.

This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage. Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.

The identification of the Norwegian D-nummer

There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.

Identifier.system is always case sensitive.

The actual Norwegian D-nummer

If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/rendered-value). Identifier.value is to be treated as case sensitive unless knowledge of the Identifier.system allows the processer to be confident that non-case-sensitive processing is safe.

Time period during which identifier is/was valid for use.

Organization that issued/manages the identifier.

The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.

Whether this related person record is in active use.

Need to be able to mark a related person record as not to be used, such as if it was created in error.

This element is labeled as a modifier because it may be used to mark that the resource was created in error.

no-basis: Can reference no-basis-Patient in addition to Patient resources. If a person reference is needed the optional extension should be used.

The patient this person is related to.

We need to know which patient this RelatedPerson is related to.

no-basis: adds slice definitions for three relationship codings from the Norwegian Folkeregisteret. Some relationships are ordered (a person is a parent of a child but the child on the other hand is the child of a parent). Ordered relationships are always expressed from the RelatedPerson instance to the Patient/Person instance referenced in the RelatedPerson.patient element. This will usually be the EXACT OPPOSITE of the actual data recorded in FREG, as relationships in FREG is recorded with the view from the Person to the RelatedPersons.

The nature of the relationship between a patient and the related person.

We need to know the relationship with the patient since it influences the interpretation of the information attributed to this person.

The directionality of the relationship is from the RelatedPerson to the Patient. For example, if the Patient is a child, and the RelatedPerson is the mother, the relationship would be PRN (parent) or MTH (mother).

• value @ coding.system

Sivilstand as registered in the norwegian Person Index (folkeregisteret).

• uoppgitt (kode i DSF: 0) • ugift (kode i DSF: 1) • gift (kode i DSF: 2) • enkeEllerEnkemann (enke eller enkemann) (kode i DSF: 3) • skilt (kode i DSF: 4) • separert (kode i DSF: 5) • registrertPartner(registrert partner) (kode i DSF: 6) • separertPartner (separert partner) (kode i DSF: 7) • skiltPartner (skilt partner) (kode i DSF: 8) • gjenlevendePartner (gjenlevende partner) (kode i DSF: 9)

We need to know the relationship with the patient since it influences the interpretation of the information attributed to this person.

The directionality of the relationship is from the RelatedPerson to the Patient. For example, if the Patient is a child, and the RelatedPerson is the mother, the relationship would be PRN (parent) or MTH (mother).

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should be an absolute reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

Family relationship from Norwegian Person Index. This is the role of the RelatedPerson instance in a familyrelation to the Person/Patient instance(relatertPersonsRolle).

mor far medmor barn søsken ektefelleEllerPartner dødfødtBarn

We need to know the relationship with the patient since it influences the interpretation of the information attributed to this person.

The directionality of the relationship is from the RelatedPerson to the Patient. For example, if the Patient is a child, and the RelatedPerson is the mother, the relationship would be PRN (parent) or MTH (mother).

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should be an absolute reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

Parental responsibility registered in Norwegian person index.

barnet har krav på omsut og omtanke frå dei som har foreldreansvaret. Dei har rett og plikt til å ta avgjerder for barnet i personlege tilhøve innanfor dei grensene som §§ 31 til 33 set. Foreldreansvaret skal utøvast ut frå barnet sine interesser og behov. Dei som har foreldreansvaret, er skyldige til å gje barnet forsvarleg oppseding og forsyting. Dei skal syte for at barnet får utdanning etter evne og givnad Inneholder hvem som evt. har foreldremyndighet for en umyndig person. foreldremyndighet = myndighet til å inneha og utøve et foreldreansvar

Kodeverdier i Registeret i Freg:

• felles
• mor
• far
• medmor
• andre
• ukjent I Registeret vil ansvaret bli vist som en to-veis relasjon vha. identifikatorer eller identifiserende informasjon. De gjeldende relasjonene til personer/barnevernsnemnd o.l. vil i praksis opphøre når personen ikke lenger er underlagt foreldreansvar, men de vil ikke opphøre i Registeret. Når informasjonen er migrert fra DSF vil Registeret være oppdatert i takt med DSF.

We need to know the relationship with the patient since it influences the interpretation of the information attributed to this person.

The directionality of the relationship is from the RelatedPerson to the Patient. For example, if the Patient is a child, and the RelatedPerson is the mother, the relationship would be PRN (parent) or MTH (mother).

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should be an absolute reference to some definition that establishes the system clearly and unambiguously.

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured, and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - e.g. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

Defines the format of norwegian human name according to norwegian legislation (lov om personnavn).

Related persons need to be identified by name, but it is uncommon to need details about multiple other names for that person.

Names may be changed, or repudiated, or people may have different names in different contexts. Names may be divided into parts of different type that have variable significance depending on context, though the division into parts does not always matter. With personal names, the different parts might or might not be imbued with some implicit meaning; various cultures associate different importance with the name parts and the degree to which systems must care about name parts around the world varies widely.

A contact detail for the person, e.g. a telephone number or an email address.

People have (primary) ways to contact them in some way such as phone, email.

Person may have multiple ways to be contacted with different uses or applicable periods. May need to have options for contacting the person urgently, and also to help with identification.

Administrative Gender - the gender that the person is considered to have for administration and record keeping purposes.

Needed for identification of the person, in combination with (at least) name and birth date.

The date on which the related person was born.

http://hl7.no/fhir/StructureDefinition/no-basis-Address

Need to keep track where the related person can be contacted per postal mail or visited.

Note: address is intended to describe postal addresses for administrative purposes, not to describe absolute geographical coordinates. Postal addresses are often used as proxies for physical locations (also see the Location resource).

Image of the person.

Many EHR systems have the capability to capture an image of persons. Fits with newer social media usage too.

The period of time during which this relationship is or was active. If there are no dates defined, then the interval is unknown.

If an individual has a relationship with a patient over multiple, non-adjacent periods, there should be a distinct RelatedPerson instance for each period. For example, if a person is a roommate for a period of time, moves out, and is later a roommate with the same person again, you would have two RelatedPerson instances.

A language which may be used to communicate with the related person about the patient's health.

If a related person does not speak the local language, interpreters may be required, so languages spoken and proficiency is an important things to keep track of both for patient and other persons of interest.

If no language is specified, this implies that the default local language is spoken. If you need to convey proficiency for multiple modes, then you need multiple RelatedPerson.Communication associations. If the RelatedPerson does not speak the default local language, then the Interpreter Required Standard can be used to explicitly declare that an interpreter is required.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and managable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

The ISO-639-1 alpha 2 code in lower case for the language, optionally followed by a hyphen and the ISO-3166-1 alpha 2 code for the region in upper case; e.g. "en" for English, or "en-US" for American English versus "en-AU" for Australian English.

Most systems in multilingual countries will want to convey language. Not all systems actually need the regional dialect.

The structure aa-BB with this exact casing is one the most widely used notations for locale. However not all systems actually code this but instead have it as free text. Hence CodeableConcept instead of code as the data type.

Indicates whether or not the related person prefers this language (over other languages he or she masters up a certain level).

People that master multiple languages up to certain level may prefer one or more, i.e. feel more confident in communicating in a particular language making other languages sort of a fall back method.

This language is specifically identified for communicating healthcare information.